5th Grade science student examines hemoglobin
We’ve known college students enjoy using physical models of proteins and learn equally well from both computer aided molecular visualization software as they do physical models. Could the same apply to kids? How young of an audience can we communicate basic molecular biology? In doing so, can we raise basic science literacy at a young age? We believe that the similarities of plastic protein model to a plastic action figure toy is fundamentally connected to material constructions of each object and that this association bypasses educational barriers which would otherwise prohibit science communication.
Recently, we got the chance to put some of these questions to a test and present our Hemoglobin models to Brooklyn PS321’s 5th Grade science class. Beth Handman, Vice Principal at PS321 put us in touch with Science Teacher, Patricia Nock. Patty worked with me to develop a lesson plan for the kids which would introduce a number of basic concepts related to proteins models. Right around the 5th grade, kids start learning about the Scientific Method and the importance of using Scientific Models to understand test results. Our thought was that this could be a great age to introduce to children a new type of scientific model based on protein data, especially given their familiarity to plastic toys.
Thoughts on Lecture and Study
It was important to present the children with proteins through a variety of visual formats in order to determine if and how successful our protein models are compared to existing methodologies of communicating protein specific information. Existing formats include: Molecular visualization software (3D protein viewers), which allows a user to orient and explore protein data on the computer. Illustrations and 3D animations which convey larger narrative information, and finally our own hand held models. All interpretations of the same data, yet 3 distinct outlets for visualization. In the lecture, we introduced the kids to 4 different proteins: Ferritin, Antibody, Ribosome, and Hemoglobin. We presented information about each protein using a combination of 3D animation, illustration and molecular visualization software.
To isolate how effective our models is, we divided the four classes into three different groups, presenting each with information about the first three proteins identically, while Hemoglobin slightly differently. Group A was just shown Hemoglobin using illustration and a computer aided 3D viewer alone. Group B was shown Hemoglobin with illustration and physical protein model alone. Finally, Group C was shown all options: illustration, 3D protein viewer, and physical protein model. At the completion of the lecture, we asked the kids to participate in a small survey. It was important for us to say to the children that this was not for a grade, and that we just wanted to know how much each child could recall, stressing that it was “OK” if they didn’t remember the answers. Patty wanted me to be aware that it could be difficult for kids to remember terms never presented to them before. To her credit, the results showed something quite different.
Lecture Description
Atomic Age, Classic Illustrated. 1960
The lecture was devised to provide the kids with a basic understanding of atoms so that we could then build that into a larger understanding of proteins. Starting with the Periodic Table, we went from there to talk about how small atoms are, and why we need scientific models of proteins in order to see them. We went through a lot of brand new information with the kids that day. I had the help of a comic book to do so. Going through my graphic novel archives, I came across a Classic Illustrated book discussing the history leading up to “The Atomic Age.” Narratives such as this are fantastic ways to communicate a lot of information, while maintaining an audience’s attention. This comic book allowed me to build from the period table to the idea that proteins are simply atoms organized into larger structures.
After this, I shared with the kids examples of protein data by referring to the proteins as “specimens,” like a zoo keeper might describe a small creature. We wanted to talk about some basic information with the kids: That proteins come in all sorts of shapes and sizes, and they do specific things. We labeled specific structures in the proteins, and related those structures to protein function. We did so by relating proteins to the kids like they were “characters” themselves from a larger story. Ferritin was described as a “Recycling Bin” where the cell stores important atoms like Iron. Antibodies are the “watchdogs of the cell” and alert the defense system to invaders. Ribosomes were bakers, reading a recipe and baking protein cakes. Whenever possible, 3D animations were used to tell those narratives.
Examples of Molecular Visualization Modalities:
- Antibody Illustration: David Goodsell
Ferritin: 3D Protein Viewer
At this point in the lecture, after describing each of the proteins you see above, we either stopped and broke the first two of four classes into Groups A and B, or we continued on with the lecture without breaking the children up into two groups (Group C) and presented both computer aided visualization of proteins and physical model.
Study Results
5th Grader examines Oxygen bound to Hemoglobin
This was a small study, with only about 120 kids, and can be difficult to isolate concrete results about any one specific modality of visualization. Two of the five questions asked had to do with Hemoglobin, while the rest sampled from other information in the lecture. One of the Hemoglobin questions resulted in higher scores from both Group B classes (the kids that got to hold the model), while the other question showed mixed results between Group A and B. What we did see as significant is that both classes of Group C (the 2 classes that had access to both 3D software viewer and physical protein model) did better on both questions than Group A and B. This result in fact matches the results from a study conducted at Carleton College which concluded that the most effective manner at educating college students about x-ray crystallography data is through the combined application of computer aided visualization and physical model. (Kelly 2001)
After we finished evaluating the results, a Hemoglobin model was donated to PS321 making certain all children will get the chance to learn from the model. The children we saw a second time remembered the lecture and many could recall Hemoglobin by name. Some could even name sub-structures five weeks after having first seen it.
Summary
Our take-away from this informal evaluation is as follows:
- It is possible to successfully teach basic molecular biology information to kids as young as the 5th grade. 81% of the students could remember that Hemoglobin was responsible for transporting Oxygen throughout the body and 69% of the kids could label the HEME group inside the protein. 87% of the kids could tell us that “proteins are made of atoms.”
- Children respond very well to 3D animation. You could hear a chorus of “YES!” all the way down the hall when I asked if the kids wanted to watch another animation.
- Children responded very well to personifications of proteins. When describing a ribosome like a “baker” reading a “protein recipe,” one child responded by asking: “If a ribosome is a baker, then would the cell be the restaurant?”
- Children responded well to the information that they were some of the first people to ever “see” proteins, and seemed to be excited at the idea of discovering things that most other people don’t yet know.
- Girls and boys seemed to respond equally well to the physical models. Some girls thought it reminded them of candy and jewelry, while one boy relayed to me while holding Hemoglobin in his hand that: “Wow, I never knew that is what a protein actually looked like! Hemoglobin proteins are pretty cool!” On child also commented that, “Now I get why I should eat high-protein foods. I never thought about what they do for our bodies.” Many seemed interested in where I bought it, and excited to find out a toy maker helped design it. One little girl thanked me after the lecture for teaching her about atoms, while another asked a very difficult to answer question about “how proteins know what to do.”
- Later, Patty relayed this to me: “When the portion of the class that was the “test” group realized that they did not get a chance to see and hold a physical representation of the hemoglobin model, they were very disappointed.” As we noted above, we have since donated a model to PS321, so that all of the children get the chance to learn from it. The model is now being shared with even younger science classes, and received with equal enthusiasm.
- Sharing information within a group appears to be a very natural way in which children learn. Once one child knew a structure by name, the physical model very quickly allowed them to point out and hand around the information to their neighbor. According to a recent NRC report, faculty who make lectures interactive, work in groups with “real-world” examples are more successful at teaching scientific concepts.
- It appears physical protein models are as effective at teaching basic scientific information to children as they are at teaching adults/college students. Both young and old seem to learn as effectively from protein models as they do other media formats and appear to benefit similarly from a shared recipe of: “Physical Model and Computer Aided Visualizations.”
- Most importantly, the overall results from the written assessment confirmed our hypothesis that students exposed to the physical models absorbed the information more effectively than children who did not. As is evident in many other studies, compelling visual storytelling, practical real-world examples of science and hands-on discovery improve student understanding. According to Patty, “I agree that there is great value associated with the incorporating models into learning experiences.”
Jean Claude Michel Jr.
For those interested, here’s a link to the Google Presentation I gave to the kids: LINK I must give credit to a few artist’s whose work you’ll see in this lecture. First, Drew Berry. The amazing video of Protein Synthesis was hands down the kids favorite animation, and a true accomplishment in the world of molecular animation. Also, David Goodsell’s illustrations from his “Molecule of the Month” series. I consider the protein illustrations created for this presentation to be “after” his aesthetic approach, and done so specifically to ensure a common visual approach when presenting protein illustrations. Jean Claude Michel Jr., a good friend and fellow Medical Illustrator also helped out with fun cartoon character. The kids responded with enthusiasm to the cartoon respiratory and circulatory system revealed during the lecture. And finally, I believe Gay Welker is to be attributed for the amazing historical comic book frames taken from Classics Illustrated, June 1960 Number 156A.
Thanks for reading. Check back again soon. We’ll be posting photos of new proteins in the coming weeks!
bioDesigner casey@biological-design.com http://www.biological-design.com
Biologic Design 